In most discussions of Aldous Huxley’s , the two books are viewed as conflicting, each host to their own opposite, incompatible ideas.While it’s quite true that Huxley and Orwell imagined very different worlds, they shared a few common elements- ultimately, a careful reading of both reveals that their message is the same, in spite of the differences in execution.
In most discussions of Aldous Huxley’s , the two books are viewed as conflicting, each host to their own opposite, incompatible ideas.While it’s quite true that Huxley and Orwell imagined very different worlds, they shared a few common elements- ultimately, a careful reading of both reveals that their message is the same, in spite of the differences in execution.Tags: Salt MetathesisHook For Abortion EssayCause And Effect Essay Topic IdeasCritical Thinking ApplicationMfa Creative Writing Programs Rankings 2014Prize Essay CompetitionThesis SimulationsBest Essay HelpCompetency Mapping Research PapersDissertation Only Phd
Erasure of the Past One prevalent theme of both books was the destruction of history- in , the history Oceania’s war with Eurasia, for instance, is blurred and smeared- in the minds of the people, it has always been.
Winston, of course, knows better, and is aware that in spite of the fact that the past is concrete and unchanging, the government seems able to reach back through time and change the knowledge of the past, thus making it seem as if the war has always been so.
Nonetheless, I feel that there are some important, oft-overlooked parallels between , the “savage” who clings to chastity, has self-discipline and control, unlike the world around him.
Even the solitude that allows individuals a chance to think alone and for themselves is frowned upon in both for their respective jobs. In both books, the only activities that seem to exist as solitary ones were sleep and the drinking of Victory Gin, or the taking of soma.
They don’t know happiness, because they don’t know how to seek it and ultimately do not care to.
No Time for Love , married couples are as good as emotionally divorced from one another, children are taught to suspect and police their parents, and nobody is to love another outside of a few token words.
Those who step out of line risk having their existences erased. In , eugenics has created a society in which people are bred for their jobs- when workers are needed, they are cultivated as clones.
A person’s rank is to determined before birth) Alpha, Beta, Gamma, etc.) and the most intelligent are given the least alcohol as fetuses that they might develop with the most intelligence.
The knowledge of the past is more or less buried, and most people couldn’t be brought to care about it- they’re just interested in the next of the , allowing audiences to experience what was going on in the movie via some sort of connection to the nervous system.
Orwell, on the other hand, was a bit more conservative, sticking to televisions that watch and listen to you, while broadcasting empty propaganda.