And once the black skin ancestry was linked to slavery, racism took on a power of its own and continued unabated even when slavery came to an end.
The world body reiterates the view that racism was used for legitimising the slave trade and all its horrifying practices.
Race relations in Brazil and the United States indicate that prejudice caused by colour differences was universal and the domination and discrimination of the blacks by the non-blacks can be seen wherever and whenever the non-blacks have the power and incentive to show it. The roots of racism cannot be imputed to the immoral concepts or human nature.
If it is a given that the main function of racism is to deny some people equal access to resources, then it is apt to intensify radically when the authority instituted by slavery is disputed, as happened in the United States when slavery was abolished.
The struggle against and later the abolition of slavery did not lead to a race-free social order.
However, they were not enslaved even in the Deep Southern states where slavery was defended vociferously.
In fact, it would have been cheaper to have enslaved these Europeans than to spend money to buy and transport black slaves from Africa.
The Bacon’s Rebellion of 1676 served to change the basis of slavery from one founded on economic standing to one based on the colour of the skin.
This is because of the divide and rule policy of the owners who wished to subdue the rebellion by isolating the poor whites from the Africans thus preventing the united strength of the two labour forces.
In fact, the deportation of such people into slavery in the Americas would have reduced the social and political upheavals that took place during that era.
These arguments clearly demonstrate that there was no intention of enslaving white people even if they were found to be society misfits and worked for measly sums: Their freedom or that of their children was never questioned.