The sources should be diverse; you should not have more than two (of the five) articles from the same author or periodical; if you do have more than two from the same author or periodical, then you should have more than the minimum five sources.Ideally, your collection of scholarly sources should include a variety of social science disciplines as well as different research methods.Tags: A Journey By Train EssayWhy I Want To Be A Dentist EssaySample Business Contingency PlanEssays On Adolescent BereavementApplication Of Critical ThinkingEconomic Research PaperWriting Ph.D ThesisPersuasive Essay On Child Adoption
Others can come from Google Scholar, scholarly books, or research studies from credible organizations.
At least two of your sources must be no older than two years.
Discussion and Evaluation (include section heading; 2 paragraphs): This section is your discussion and evaluation of the articles from your summary section and not your discussion of the issues themselves.
Instead, you are interpreting and evaluating the knowledge presented in the summary section in order to raise questions for further research (gaps in knowledge).
For example, if you were studying prison reform, one paragraph might present what three scholars have reported regarding education programs in prison, even though one or more of those authors might show up again in another paragraph on visitation rights.
If a paragraph happens to focus on only one author or article, make sure this is for a good reason, for example, the article represents the authoritative discussion of a particular issue; in such a case, the content of that paragraph should be limited to the issue and not turn into a general summary of the article.
You may discuss and evaluate the significance of various conclusions and arguments, the completeness of individual studies, the research methods used, substantial areas of disagreement, debates over definitions of terms, and/or the consistency of the results with each other.
As you present your evaluation, do so cautiously with thorough analysis and explanation.
There is, after all, no point in reinventing the wheel, i.e., undertaking a study that someone else has already done or trying to answer a question that has already been adequately explored.
And there's also no point in reaching your own interpretive conclusions without taking into account what others have already studied and argued.