The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, is rather low.A larger sample with regard to all categories would have aided in the data analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching level.The scale uses 60 statements, which were preceded by In coaching, I: A Likert scale was then given for each statement: 1 = never; 2 = seldom; 3 = occasionally; 4 = often; and 5 = always. Scales were administered in a number of environmental settings: classrooms, gymnasiums, practice fields, and offices.Tags: Houghton Mifflin Math Homework Book Grade 5 AnswersEssay On Disrespect In The MilitaryReal Estate Management Business PlanEdward Weston EssayPig Farming Business Plan In IndiaBusiness Plan Matrix
This paper would have been even better if the student had added a sentence or two about the results of the study.
That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.
Some questions are relevant to this article some are not.
I listed so many questions simply because Id like you to learn what to look for in evaluating a research article.5.
The instrument utilized was the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS) developed by Zhang, Jensen, and Mann in 1996.
This scale is used to measure six leadership behaviors: training and instruction, democratic, autocratic, social support, positive feedback, and situational consideration.
The analysis showed there were no significant differences between male and female coaches in overall leadership behaviors.
When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference in social support between males and females.
This is not consistent with the type of data collected.
The RLSS used a Likert scale (ordinal), yet a MANOVA would be most applicable for normally distributed, quantitative data.