Significance Hamitic Thesis

Significance Hamitic Thesis-18
The Bible is quite specific as to the direction the curse was to take insofar as Ham’s descendants were concerned: it was to fall on Canaan and his progeny - and the certainty that it did not fall on Cush is indicated by the fact that Nimrod, one of Cush’s sons, became the most powerful man of his time - and hardly could it be said of him that he was a "servant of servants" to his brethren, which most decidedly would have happened if one takes these verses literally, which one must if he really considers himself to be an evangelical.The truth is, there is nothing in the Scriptures which in any way indicates that Cush and his descendants were cursed; on the contrary, there is much which argues the opposite: specifically that the African people were a peculiar treasure unto the Lord and enjoyed a very special relationship with Him.

The Bible is quite specific as to the direction the curse was to take insofar as Ham’s descendants were concerned: it was to fall on Canaan and his progeny - and the certainty that it did not fall on Cush is indicated by the fact that Nimrod, one of Cush’s sons, became the most powerful man of his time - and hardly could it be said of him that he was a "servant of servants" to his brethren, which most decidedly would have happened if one takes these verses literally, which one must if he really considers himself to be an evangelical.The truth is, there is nothing in the Scriptures which in any way indicates that Cush and his descendants were cursed; on the contrary, there is much which argues the opposite: specifically that the African people were a peculiar treasure unto the Lord and enjoyed a very special relationship with Him.

Tags: Technology Changing Education EssayDefine Business PlanningModel Essay ReportsCause And Effect Of Iraq War EssayPeer Editing Checklist Expository EssayWhat Is A Marketing Plan In A Business Plan3000 Word Essay 2 DaysGreat Authors Essays

The Belgians needed allies, there were simply not enough of them (i.e., whites) to go around to adequately control the country.

They therefore postulated that the Tutsi Tribe - a minority tribe in the area - were really "black Caucasians" or "African Aryans." Why?

So much for the Scriptural basis for the Hamitic Hypothesis!

- the fact of the matter is, the Hamitic Hypothesis was (is) a sham cooked up by bigots to justify their racism, their past exploitation of black labor (black slavery), and their economic rape of the African continent.

There are, of course, a number of problems with this hypothesis: first, there is nothing in the Scriptures which suggests any kind of "marking" in reference to Ham and Canaan - Nothing!

There is, of course, the "sign" or mark which was placed on Cain, the son of Adam, after he slew Abel; but presumably, all of Cain’s progeny were killed off as a result of the flood.And, of course, there were reasons in choosing the Tutsi above the more numerous Hutu: economics.The fact of the matter is, the whites needed laborers, and they needed a lot of them - and there were a lot more Hutu than there were Tutsi.One thing is sure: nothing is similarly said of white Europeans - something which white evangelicals would do well to take note of before they start - directly or indirectly - buying into the Racial Christianity which pervades the thinking of some of their right-wing political and business allies.And insofar as God is concerned, this kind of thinking has a way of boomeranging, and it should be noted that in the one place where God did curse and "mark" a particular people (i.e., the sons of Cain), a second curse went along with it: "And the Lord said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold ..." (Genesis ) It’s a warning that those who buy into the Hamitic Hypothesis should take very, very seriously!The elevation of the Tutsi meant the relegation of the Hutu to the status of "Bantu serfs," and of the Twa - a small group of potters and hunter-gatherers in the area - to the lowest position of aboriginal "pygmoids," supposedly remnants of an earlier stage of human evolution.Under the Belgians, Tutsi dominance and power were extended and Tutsi privileges intensified - leading over the years to a white-hot, jealous rage on the part of the Hutus and Twa.When Noah awoke, he "knew" what Ham had done and pronounced a curse in retribution; interestingly, only Canaan is directly mentioned: "Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants he shall be to his brothers." (Gen.) According to the hypothesis, Ham and Canaan were "marked" in the pigmentation of their skin (i.e., they were made black) and thereby became the fathers of the "Negro" or "black race" - and the curse [i.e., "a servant of servants he (Canaan) shall be"] accounts for why the "black race" has suffered to such an extent at the hands of whites and Arab slave traders.These verses recount the story of Ham, the son of Noah, who, upon discovering his father naked and in a drunken stupor, "exposed" him to his brothers, Shem and Japheth.[Some commentators conjecture that the sin committed by Ham involved much more than "exposure;" specifically, bestiality and sodomy.] Canaan, Ham’s son, was also apparently involved.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Significance Hamitic Thesis

The Latest from nz-sites.ru ©